
Quick Scan
Apple gets the drop on MS by realeasing their OS a month before and for way less money.
Existing Mac customers will be much happier to upgrade for $29 rather than $129
Apple can help change the perception of costing more than MS when all the Snow Leopard vs. Windows 7 articles appear in the fall.
Showdown: Snow Leopard vs. Windows 7 – Apple Sets a Date and a Price for Their Advantage
My favorite Mac news coming out of WWDC '09 was that Apple is pricing Snow Leopard, the next version of OS X, at $29. I've been concerned that Apple might over play their hand and charge the usual $129 for a new version but without all the consumer shiny bells and whistles that get people excited. They might make some money on that approach, but probably a fraction of the usual amount.
Instead they wisely priced it at $29 (only $9.95 for those who buy new Macs after today). When I saw that, I said to myself, "They have my money." I'm willing to take a flier in that $20- $30 range, but not for $130. But when they announced it will be available in September and my first reaction was, "Really? That long?"
Then I thought about it some more and I started seeing all the articles that will be in all the different media this Fall. It's the first time in a long time Apple and MS will release new OS versions at roughly the same time, and Apple will have theirs out first and it will be priced as an upgrade way below Windows 7. There will be charts and "shootouts' and all that comparison business, but what will show up at the bottom line will be $29 vs. $99, $149 or whatever MS will be charging for the flavor you want.
That's a nice place for Apple to be in: Way cheaper than Microsoft. The way it usually goes is that Apple gets the awards for having the better product, but the PC version comes in as slightly cheaper. This way, with Snow Leopard, they should win from both angles.
Yes, I know that Apple is marketing Snow Leopard to existing Mac users who aren't about to jump to PCs over the price of an OS upgrade. The people that actually will be buying Snow Leopard are folks like you and me who are wondering whether it's worth $30 to juice our Macs up a bit.
But what the important thing Apple might achieve with this price point is altering perception. It's the switchers they are really after. And there will dozens and dozens of comparisons this holiday season and everything that points to Macs being affordable helps Apple sell more. Remember, selling hardware is where Apple makes their money.
Now if Exchange support turns out to be bulletproof, they may have a slam dunk on their hands. Another of the last reasons to not buy a Mac will be chopped down.
What do you think? Let us know in the Comments section below!
This button is an easy way to let readers bookmark articles on Digg, Del.icio.us, Stumbleupon, Google Bookmarks and other services with a single click. You can find out more about Social Bookmarking here. |
||
Most Popular Articles
How Do I Network My Mac and PC?
How Do I Change My Screenshot Format and Saved Location?
Hey, What Happened to My Print Screen Key and How Do I Take a Screenshot on My New Mac?
How Do I Change My POP3 Email to IMAP in Mail.app?
A Survivor’s Story: File and Printer Sharing with Mac OS X and Windows 7
Most Popular Help Topics
Mac Link of the Day
iTunes for Mac: Moving your iTunes Media folderLearn how to move your iTunes Media folder to a different location on your Mac.
-Apple.com


Your Comments:
chris
06/08/2009 at 02:30 PM
And MS should offer upgrades for W7 at $7.00 for those who bought VISTA, although I am not holding my breath on that one!
Jake
06/08/2009 at 06:46 PM
THOR
06/08/2009 at 10:03 PM
Macaholic
06/09/2009 at 04:39 AM
Dave Barnes
06/09/2009 at 07:54 AM
ANdy
06/10/2009 at 04:15 AM
Or will I have to pay the full $129 if not upgrading from Leopard.
Ollie
06/11/2009 at 11:05 AM
Chris Kerins
06/11/2009 at 11:52 AM
Macaholic
06/11/2009 at 11:54 AM
We all know the Mac is a better buy for a zillion reasons, not least of which is longevity and pure power that Dell and Lenovo can't match.
In the eyes of the people holding the purse strings in corporate America though, most businesses are interested in the *cheapest* solution - period.
Michael Natale
06/12/2009 at 04:57 PM