Home
My First Mac



 Help Buying and Getting
 Started with Your New Mac

Going Back To The Dark Side

Quick Scan

Parallels creates a mini Windows ready computer inside your Mac

Easy to install and use.

Costs a bit when you buy Parallels, Windows, and possibly more RAM.

Going Back To The Dark Side – An Overview of Parallels

You just switched to a Mac, so why would you want to go back? Well, no matter how much we hate it, there are just some pieces of software that are Windows-only. A relatively new solution on the market, made possible by the Intel processor on the new Macs, is the user-friendly virtual machine. So far there are several programs out there that will let you run Windows, Linux and any other number of operating systems on your Mac.

How It Works: Nova Development’s Parallels Desktop (version 3, $66.99 on Amazon.com) is one of them. Without getting into the lingo, the program creates a fake, mini computer. You can install Windows on this “computer” and access it whenever you want through the Parallels program. Whether you open it in a window or full-screen, there is a Windows desktop staring back at you. It’s downright shocking the first few times.

How It Measures Up: Parallels is relatively new but has been wildly popular. Most people love it. Some have had horrible experiences. It really comes down to what you want to do with your Windows virtual machine. If you’ve got a few programs that you need to use, that’s fine. However, if you’re a gamer extraordinaire, you may want to look elsewhere, namely BootCamp. Here’s the pro and cons breakdown.

Pros: Parallels is easy to install, from the software itself to the Windows OS you’ll be installing on your dummy virtual machine. From my experience running it on two different Macs, Windows runs near-native speed and does everything real Windows is supposed to do. I’ve never had a glitch with it.

Cons: It’s an investment. You need to purchase the $70 software, the $190 version of Windows and some extra RAM for your machine if you need it. If you do have less than 1GB of RAM, the program will run excruciatingly slow. Customer service is, from many reviews, horrible and parts of the manual have gotten lost in translation. Graphic-intensive programs and games slow the machine down.

I use Parallels because I need one or two Windows programs on a regular basis, and I know that people love using Parallels for programs like Quicken. It was a splurge for me but I’m very happy with my purchases. It took a couple tries to install Windows and I solved the problem by increasing the memory for my virtual machine.

My only real complaint is that the first moments after I start Parallels and boot up my Windows XP, the process slows both my computer and the virtual machine down.

If you’re dying to play good old Spider Solitaire on your MacBook Pro right now, give Parallels a try. If you can wait, the technology is only going to get better. Nova has just released Version 3.0 with over 50 fixes and upgrades. Whether you try Parallels now or later, you may want to buy your copy of Windows XP now, before Vista forces it off the shelves.

Mary Kolesnikova writes a website for newbies (women) to blogging. You can find her at girlcapitalist.com.


DIG DEEPER

Parallels Desktop 3.0 for Mac Website

Parallels for Mac cozies up to Vista review from InfoWorld

How to run Windows and Mac apps side-by-side with Parallels from LifeHacker

Setting up Parallels from LifeHacker

 
 

This button is an easy way to let readers bookmark articles on Digg, Del.icio.us, Stumbleupon, Google Bookmarks and other services with a single click. You can find out more about Social Bookmarking here.

CLOSE

 
 
 
 
 
 

CLOSE     

 
 







Your Comments:

As a web developer, I swear by Parallels. You can run multiple virtual machines (though not at once) which allows me to test my web sites on Windows XP and Windows 2000. I heard there were some troubles installing Vista (and licensing issues from Microsoft which will not allow you to set up Windows XP Home Basic) but the ease of using what I have is just amazing. With Safari 3.0 on Windows, it happend more than once that I forgot I was on Windows (when I downloaded a file I was looking desperately for it on my Mac Finder's Desktop until I found it on the Windows Desktop...)


 Pirco
 07/02/2007  at  10:31 AM

Apple's very own BootCamp is another alternative


 Guy
 07/14/2007  at  06:54 AM

Can you also review VMWare Fusion for Mac?

In my experience it runs MUCH faster, and smoother then Parallels ever did, especially with 1GB RAM


 Jason
 07/14/2007  at  07:23 AM

Yeah,
VMWare's Fusion is a great alternative to Parallels, it also supports some 3D acceleration in beta. Also the software is only $40 if you purchase it before the beta program is over.


 Peter Sieburg
 07/14/2007  at  07:44 AM

I have found vmware fusion to be much better alternative, especially if you have installation and set up issues. I was able to get help much easier than with parallels which kept referring me back to the readme file which did not address my problem. Works wonderfully with Solidworks 2006.


 Dice
 07/14/2007  at  08:29 AM

VMWare is better in my opinion. Those guys have been doing virtualization for years now and are real pros...

Also, you need to point out somewhere up there that PowerPC G, G4, and G4 Macs will NOT run Parallels or VmWare. There are a few choices out there for PowerPC systems that you could review but probably the most popular is Virtual PC. VPC is an emulator so it is a lot slower than Parallels or VmWare but if you have the patience, it usually works ok.


 MacinTiger
 07/14/2007  at  09:02 AM

To say that Virtual PC "is a lot slower than Parallels" is a vast understatement. It is incredibly slower!


 BobInWi
 07/15/2007  at  08:55 PM

Another vote for VMWare. I've got Parallels 2 on my MBP and VMWare Fusion Beta on my Macbook. Fusion is much nicer and seems much faster (even though it's a "slower" notebook).


 ben stewart
 07/21/2007  at  11:05 PM

My local Apple Dealer really ran down all the virtualisation products in favour of Bootcamp but so far I have had no problem with VMWare fusion and 2GB of RAM on a dual core macbook. The install was remarkably hassle free for a beta product and the pre release price was definately good value. I borrowed some games to see if I can get the performance to fail. Ran Age of Empires 2 with all the bells and whistles set to on and saw no problems. Will try more recent and graphics intensive applications when I get a chance.


 Andrew
 07/29/2007  at  09:49 PM

I'm also interested in running Solidworks on a Mac. What type of Mac are you running this on? Have you had any strange issues or things that don't work? Thanks for any suggestions.


 John
 08/07/2007  at  03:25 PM

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

Your response:

Name: Email:

Notify me of follow-up comments

Enter the word you see below:


Remember my personal information

Please keep your comments related to the topic. Personal attacks, offensive language or comments containing advertising will be deleted and you may be banned from MFM.